ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > News Articles > Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
ACDN, What is it ?

External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World




Background papers


French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

On radio "France-Inter"
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
Broadcast live from Tehran, an interview with Ali Lakhijani, the general secretary of the National Security Commission

Published 16 February 2006

On Thursday 16 February, from 7 to 9 am Paris time (9.30 to 11.30 in Tehran) radio France-Inter came live from Tehran. During this exceptional broadcast, Ali Lakhijani, the general secretary of the Supreme Council for National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the man in charge of the nuclear dossier, and a personal adviser to Ayatollah Ali Khatami the Islamic Republic’s "supreme guide", agreed to answer live some questions put by two France-Inter journalists, Stéphane Paoli and Bernard Guetta, questions he had not seen in advance.

He reaffirmed that Iran, a signatory to the NPT unlike states like India, Pakistan and Israel, intends to continue observing its rules while also exercising the right which all signatories have under the Treaty to develop the whole nuclear cycle for non-military purposes.

He went on to recall that Iran, which in the time of the Shah had held 10% of the capital of Eurodif, received from it not a gram of uranium and not a single dollar. Similarly the atomic reactor (for research) built in Tehran by the US, in which Iran has invested 2 million dollars has not received from the Americans the fuel that they promised. Under these circumstances it is comprehensible that Iran should wish to obtain by itself the fuel that others refuse to provide. Iran would be ready to buy it on the international market if there were guarantees of certain supply. For the moment that is not the case.

Unanimously, Iran considers that the right of access to non-military nuclear technology is part of its sovereignty. Iran does not want atom bombs, simply because they are not nowadays an instrument of regional power, and do not make possible the resolution of political problems. Iran is well-disposed to being monitored by the IAEA.

Far from ruling out the pursuit of negotiations with western powers, Mr Lakhijani wished on the contrary to resume talks with the European Union. Military confrontation is not a way to resolve this problem. He recalled also that, as everyone knows, Israel possesses 200 nuclear warheads, suggesting that Israel is not particularly well placed to ask others not to build any.

He declared that Iran, as a responsible state, did not wish to use the "oil weapon" either, since that would destabilise the world economy; but this position could change if a confrontation were to occur.

Stéphane Paoli mentioned the very recent statement (on France 2) for France’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Philippe Douste-Blazy, who said for the first time that in his opinion Iran wanted to obtain nuclear weapons. Mr Lakhijani replied thus:

"I have a great respect for M. Douste-Blazy, but I do not understand why he makes such statements... I think that the French have an important place in this affair. In his shoes, I would use the opportunity....I think that France has the ability to come and make peace, but not with such statements... The EU must have its own position. We are ready to (resume) dialogue with the EU. We engaged in dialogue with the EU for 3 years, and for 3 years we suspended our programme for enriching uranium. Iran wants non-military nuclear technology within the framework of the IAEA and the NPT."

He declared that the countries of the EU had their place in cooperation on nuclear programmes, such as the building of the facility at Bushehr, and that their presence within a consortium would be an extra guarantee against any diversion of fuel for military purposes.

When asked how one can, today, call into question the existence of Israel or of the Holocaust, as President Ahmadinejad did, Mr Lakhajani distanced himself with declarations about "personalities"... which are "a different question" from Iran’s policies. Iran asks only that Israel respect democracy and recognise the right of its Palestinian citizens, whether Christian or Muslim, to take part in Israel’s elections.

Other questions were touched on during this mission. A businessman heading an important mineral-water company emphasised that he wanted to develop the participation of western groups, which must be allowed to expand into various sectors of Iran’s economy. He declared also that Iranians as a whole approve of access to non-military nuclear technology as a matter of national sovereignty. The France-Inter journalists also made street-interviews of young people (60% of Iranians are under 25), who though critical of the regime seemed to agree on that same point.

Report: ACDN, 16 February 2006

Iran reaffirms commitment to NPT, IAEA Safeguards

New York, Feb 19, IRNA


Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Ali Larijani said in an interview with French radio that the Islamic Republic of Iran wants to use the peaceful nuclear energy within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

"The Islamic Republic of Iran has been and continues be committed to its international non-proliferation commitments. Unfortunately certain western countries, contrary to their public statements, have been insisting in the negotiations that Iran should not have any nuclear technology and know-how. This is a double-standard behavior in international system and cannot be acceptable," he added.

The Islamic Republic of Iran, like other nations such as Brazil, Japan and many European countries, would like to exercise its inalienable rights to peaceful use of nuclear technology and play its role in this category of countries in international arena, he said.

Larijani said that the best guarantee for peacefulness of the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran could include the following measures:
"Accepting the current IAEA monitoring and verification systems, Use of modern centrifuges, proposed by some American and British scientists, which permit only limited enrichment, participation of interested countries in Iran’s peaceful nuclear activities in the form of a consortium."

Accordingly, there are various ways to ensure that Iran is not pursuing Military nuclear programs, he added.

"Should these guarantees be acceptable, the Islamic Republic of Iran would accept to send the Additional Protocol to the Parliament for ratification."
It has been the consistent policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran to employ peaceful nuclear technology for country’s economic development, Larijani pointed out.

It would be much more appropriate that rather than simply repeating the positions of the United States, the EU would act independently and propose new ways on the basis of the inalienable rights enshrined in the NPT, he added.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran stands ready to cooperate with the EU in this regard and it is appropriate to avoid the language of threat and imposition in this process. Therefore, should the EU change its discourse and stand ready to clearly recognize Iran’s rights in the framework of the NPT, there will be a complete readiness on Iran’s side to cooperate with Europe."

The Islamic Republic of Iran, he added, is ready to negotiate and with all other countries (except the Zionist regime) on the issue.

The main problem with the European’s proposal in August 2005 was its negligence of Iran’s inalienable right to peaceful nuclear technology, in contradiction to the provisions of the NPT, recalled Larijani.

"We are of the view that the potentials and capacities of the European Union can be employed to resolve this issue and we stand ready to cooperate with the EU for the longer term as well. In the past, we had the same position, but we have not witnessed appropriate behaviors from the European side.

"The cancellation of the construction of the Bushehr power plant by the Siemens of Germany, the refusal of France’s EURODIEF to deliver Uranium and failure of the United State’s to honor its commitment to deliver the Uranium for Tehran’s research reactor, which had been paid for, are but a few examples of behaviors that are not comprehensible.

"These are some of the reasons which have caused our mistrust towards the West and have encouraged us to go for the completion of our own peaceful nuclear program.

"Should a credible international system for providing nuclear fuel be in place, the Islamic Republic of Iran would be ready to procure its nuclear fuel from that system. However, such a system does not exist at present."

L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version

Share through social networks

Also in this section

In Gaza, Genocide by Depleted Uranium has begun
France is well on the way to another Fukushima
Michel Rocard, Nuclear Abolition and the Referendum
The Iraq lesson: the attack on “Forward Base Falcon”
A Time for Boldness
The Soup and Lentils will be Radioactive
Good Wishes and Good Proposals for 2013
Is Brazil resuming its progress towards the Bomb?
Vanunu and the question of nuclear weapons lie at the heart of the problems in the Middle-East

navigation motscles

Civilian and millitary nuclearism
Phasing Out Military AND Civilian Nuclearism
In full: Brown’s nuclear speech
France is going to change her method of enriching uranium
No to civil and military nuclearism!
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
Should we scrap the NPT and dismantle the IAEA?
DECLARATION of the Mediterranean No Nuclear Neighbourhood - MN3
The Nuclear Issue: Disarm and Live
The team of "Energy Challenge" made landfall at Sainte Anne de la Martinique
In Washington, Sarkozy is defending France’s nuclear deterrence
Does François Bayrou really want nuclear disarmament ?
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
French National Campaign: THE VERY LAST ATOM!
No to War, No to NATO!
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
Good News from Russia: nuclear disarmament progressing... unintentionally!
Cardinal Lustiger, the Church in France, and the Atom Bomb
IRAN : International Rally in Saintes - last chance for peace and nuclear disarmament?
IRAN : No proliferation! No war!
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
War against Iran
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
Leading Americans Ask U.S. Military to Refuse Orders to Attack Iran
StratCom already planning pre-emptive strike on Iran
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating
Nuclear power plants
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
France’s new president planning to sell nuclear power plants to Algeria
Nuclear is not the Answer
Will France be caught with its plants down?
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
US-India Nuclear Deal
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
India Abandons Global Nuclear Disarmament
Secret sale of UK plutonium to Israel
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Iran and the Bomb
European Parliament resolution on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction: A role for the European Parliament (2005/2139(INI))
Israelis consider attack on Iran
Mohamed ElBaradei - Nobel Lecture
Nuclear Clouds Gather Over Asia
DECLARATION of the "Nuclear Phasing Out" French Network on the Current "Iranian Crisis"
Neither Bush nor Blair is in a position to take a high moral line on Iran’s nuclear programme
The death-cult
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
Bush doesn’t want detente. He wants to attack Iran
WWIII or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran
US Air Strikes
Letter to President Jacques Chirac, 6 April 2003
Robert Gates: Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in the 21st Century
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
Calling for a cease-fire
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran

visites :  810325

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs