ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > External sources > UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells. Europe contaminated?
ACDN, What is it ?

External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World




Background papers


French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells. Europe contaminated?

Published 7 March 2006

The Sunday Times February 19, 2006

Mark Gould and Jon Ungoed-Thomas

RADIATION detectors in Britain recorded a fourfold increase in uranium levels in the atmosphere after the “shock and awe” bombing campaign against Iraq, according to a report.

Environmental scientists who uncovered the figures through freedom of information laws say it is evidence that depleted uranium from the shells was carried by wind currents to Britain.

Government officials, however, say the sharp rise in uranium detected by radiation monitors in Berkshire was a coincidence and probably came from local sources.

The results from testing stations at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston and four other stations within a 10-mile radius were obtained by Chris Busby, of Liverpool University’s department of human anatomy and cell biology.

Each detector recorded a significant rise in uranium levels during the Gulf war bombing campaign in March 2003. The reading from a park in Reading was high enough for the Environment Agency to be alerted.

Busby, who has advised the government on radiation and is a founder of Green Audit, the environmental consultancy, believes “uranium aerosols” from Iraq were widely dispersed in the atmosphere and blown across Europe.

“This research shows that rather than remaining near the target as claimed by the military, depleted uranium weapons contaminate both locals and whole populations hundreds to thousands of miles away,” he said.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) countered that it was “unfeasible” depleted uranium could have travelled so far. Radiation experts also said that other environmental sources were more likely to blame.

The “shock and awe” campaign was one of the most devastating assaults in modern warfare. In the first 24-hour period more than 1,500 bombs and missiles were dropped on Baghdad.

During the conflict A10 “tankbuster” planes - which use munitions containing depleted uranium - fired 300,000 rounds. The substance - dubbed a “silver bullet” because of its ability to pierce heavy tank armour - is controversial because of its potential effect on human health. Critics say it is chemically toxic and can cause cancer, and Iraqi doctors reported a marked rise in cancer cases after it was used in the first Gulf conflict.

The American and British governments say depleted uranium is relatively harmless, however. The Royal Society, the UK’s academy of science, has also said the risk from depleted uranium is “very low” for soldiers and people in a conflict zone.

Busby’s report shows that within nine days of the start of the Iraq war on March 19, 2003, higher levels of uranium were picked up on five sites in Berkshire. On two occasions, levels exceeded the threshold at which the Environment Agency must be informed, though within safety limits. The report says weather conditions over the war period showed a consistent flow of air from Iraq northwards.

Brian Spratt, who chaired the Royal Society’s report, cast doubt on depleted uranium as a source but said it could have come from natural uranium in the massive amounts of soil kicked up by shock and awe.

Other experts said local environmental sources, such as a power station, were more likely at fault. The Environment Agency said detectors at other sites did not record a similar increase, which suggested a local source.

A MoD spokesman said the uranium was of a “natural origin” and there was no evidence that depleted uranium had reached Britain from Iraq.


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version

Share through social networks

Also in this section

WWIII or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran
Africa for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
US Congress resolution versus UN fact-finding report (Oct 29, 2009)
Pre-emptive nuclear strike a key option, Nato told
In full: Brown’s nuclear speech
Full Text of nuclear deal between Iran and P5 +1
UN Security Council Seats Taken by Arms Exporters
Disarm to Develop
Depleted Uranium Situation Worsens Requiring Immediate Action By President Bush, Prime Minister Blair, and Prime Minister Olmert
US Air Strikes

navigation motscles

Depleted Uranium
The Iraq lesson: the attack on “Forward Base Falcon”
Israel did use Depleted Uranium weapons in the Gaza Strip
Letter to President Jacques Chirac, 6 April 2003
Arab states say Israel used ammo in Gaza that contained depleted uranium
Depleted Uranium in Gaza: the UN must investigate.
We are killing our own!
In Gaza, Genocide by Depleted Uranium has begun
Towards a UN Investigation into Depleted Uranium in Gaza
War crimes in Gaza - the data on depleted uranium
Genocide by Depleted Uranium in Gaza: the dossier
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
Bush doesn’t want detente. He wants to attack Iran
D.U. Effects on People in the South of Iraq
Generals opposing Iraq war break with military tradition
Fallujah babies born with birth defects as a result of DU Weapons
United Kingdom
Secret sale of UK plutonium to Israel
The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating
Speech at the Chamber of Commerce in Delhi
Barack Obama undertakes to work for the abolition of nuclear weapons
British Foreign Minister calls for work to begin on a nuclear-weapon-free world
Trident Replacement debate in Britain
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
First Minister Alex Salmond wants Scotland, UK and the World rid of nuclear weapons
Open Letter to Prime Minister Gordon Brown
War With Russia Is On The Agenda
President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
The military’s problem with the President’s Iran policy.
The death-cult
DECLARATION of the "Nuclear Phasing Out" French Network on the Current "Iranian Crisis"
Leading Americans Ask U.S. Military to Refuse Orders to Attack Iran
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran

visites :  810325

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs