ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > External sources > President Obama: "The United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons"
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

5 April 2009
President Obama: "The United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons"
Full text of Obama’s Speech in Prague


Published 5 April 2009

Prague, Czech Republic - President Obama delivered the following remarks, at Hradcany Square in Prague on Sunday, 5 April 2009. Full text of the speech, as prepared for delivery.


THE WHITE HOUSE,
Office of the Press Secretary

“Thank you for this wonderful welcome. Thank you to the people of Prague. And thank you to the
people of the Czech Republic. Today, I am proud
to stand here with you in the middle of this great
city, in the center of Europe. And - to
paraphrase one my predecessors - I am also proud to be the
man who brought Michelle Obama to Prague.

I have learned over many years to appreciate the
good company and good humor of the Czech people
in my hometown of Chicago. Behind me is a statue
of a hero of the Czech people - Tomas Masaryk.
In 1918, after America had pledged its support
for Czech independence, Masaryk spoke to a crowd in
Chicago that was estimated to be over 100,000. I
don’t think I can match Masaryk’s record, but I’m
honored to follow his footsteps from Chicago to Prague.

For over a thousand years, Prague has set itself
apart from any other city in any other place. You have
known war and peace. You have seen empires rise
and fall. You have led revolutions in the arts and
science, in politics and poetry. Through it all,
the people of Prague have insisted on pursuing their
own path, and defining their own destiny. And
this city - this Golden City which is both ancient and
youthful - stands as a living monument to your unconquerable spirit.

When I was born, the world was divided, and our
nations were faced with very different
circumstances. Few people would have predicted
that someone like me would one day become an
American President. Few people would have
predicted that an American President would one day be
permitted to speak to an audience like this in
Prague. And few would have imagined that the Czech
Republic would become a free nation, a member of
NATO, and a leader of a united Europe. Those
ideas would have been dismissed as dreams.

We are here today because enough people ignored
the voices who told them that the world could not
change.

We are here today because of the courage of those
who stood up - and took risks - to say that
freedom is a right for all people, no matter what
side of a wall they live on, and no matter what they
look like.

We are here today because of the Prague Spring -
because the simple and principled pursuit of liberty
and opportunity shamed those who relied on the
power of tanks and arms to put down the will of the
people.

We are here today because twenty years ago, the
people of this city took to the streets to claim the
promise of a new day, and the fundamental human
rights that had been denied to them for far too
long. Sametová revoluce - the Velvet Revolution
taught us many things. It showed us that peaceful
protest could shake the foundation of an empire,
and expose the emptiness of an ideology. It showed
us that small countries can play a pivotal role
in world events, and that young people can lead the way
in overcoming old conflicts. And it proved that
moral leadership is more powerful than any weapon.
That is why I am speaking to you in the center of
a Europe that is peaceful, united and free - because
ordinary people believed that divisions could be
bridged; that walls could come down; and that peace
could prevail.

We are here today because Americans and Czechs
believed against all odds that today could be
possible.

We share this common history. But now this
generation - our generation - cannot stand still. We, too,
have a choice to make. As the world has become
less divided it has become more inter-connected.
And we have seen events move faster than our
ability to control them - a global economy in crisis; a
changing climate; the persistent dangers of old
conflicts, new threats and the spread of catastrophic
weapons.

None of these challenges can be solved quickly or
easily. But all of them demand that we listen to
one another and work together; that we focus on
our common interests, not our occasional
differences; and that we reaffirm our shared
values, which are stronger than any force that could drive
us apart. That is the work that we must carry on.
That is the work that I have come to Europe to
begin.

To renew our prosperity, we need action
coordinated across borders. That means investments to
create new jobs. That means resisting the walls
of protectionism that stand in the way of growth. That
means a change in our financial system, with new
rules to prevent abuse and future crisis. And we
have an obligation to our common prosperity and
our common humanity to extend a hand to those
emerging markets and impoverished people who are
suffering the most, which is why we set aside
over a trillion dollars for the International Monetary Fund earlier this week.

To protect our planet, now is the time to change
the way that we use energy. Together, we must
confront climate change by ending the world’s
dependence on fossil fuels, tapping the power of new
sources of energy like the wind and sun, and
calling upon all nations to do their part. And I pledge to
you that in this global effort, the United States is now ready to lead.

To provide for our common security, we must
strengthen our alliance. NATO was founded sixty
years ago, after Communism took over
Czechoslovakia. That was when the free world learned too
late that it could not afford division. So we
came together to forge the strongest alliance that the
world has ever known. And we stood shoulder to
shoulder - year after year, decade after decade -
until an Iron Curtain was lifted, and freedom spread like flowing water.

This marks the tenth year of NATO membership for
the Czech Republic. I know that many times in
the 20th century, decisions were made without you
at the table. Great powers let you down, or
determined your destiny without your voice being
heard. I am here to say that the United States will
never turn its back on the people of this nation.
We are bound by shared values, shared history, and
the enduring promise of our alliance. NATO’s
Article 5 states it clearly: an attack on one is an attack
on all. That is a promise for our time, and for all time.

The people of the Czech Republic kept that
promise after America was attacked, thousands were
killed on our soil, and NATO responded. NATO’s
mission in Afghanistan is fundamental to the
safety of people on both sides of the Atlantic.
We are targeting the same al Qaeda terrorists who have
struck from New York to London, and helping the
Afghan people take responsibility for their future.
We are demonstrating that free nations can make
common cause on behalf of our common security.
And I want you to know that we Americans honor
the sacrifices of the Czech people in this endeavor,
and mourn the loss of those you have lost.

No alliance can afford to stand still. We must
work together as NATO members so that we have
contingency plans in place to deal with new
threats, wherever they may come from. We must
strengthen our cooperation with one another, and
with other nations and institutions around the world,
to confront dangers that recognize no borders.
And we must pursue constructive relations with Russia
on issues of common concern.

One of those issues that I will focus on today is fundamental to our nations, and to the peace and security of the world - the future of nuclear weapons in the 21st century.

The existence of thousands of nuclear weapons is the most dangerous legacy of the Cold War. No nuclear war was fought between the United States and the Soviet Union, but generations lived with the knowledge that their world could be erased in a single flash of light. Cities like Prague that had existed for centuries would have ceased to exist.

Today, the Cold War has disappeared but thousands of those weapons have not. In a strange turn of history, the threat of global nuclear war has gone down, but the risk of a nuclear attack has gone up. More nations have acquired these weapons. Testing has continued. Black markets trade in nuclear secrets and materials. The technology to build a bomb has spread. Terrorists are determined to buy, build or steal one. Our efforts to contain these dangers are centered in a global non-proliferation regime, but as more people and nations break the rules, we could reach the point when the center cannot hold.

This matters to all people, everywhere. One nuclear weapon exploded in one city - be it New York or Moscow, Islamabad or Mumbai, Tokyo or Tel Aviv, Paris or Prague - could kill hundreds of thousands of people. And no matter where it happens, there is no end to what the consequences may be - for our global safety, security, society, economy, and ultimately our survival.

Some argue that the spread of these weapons cannot be checked - that we are destined to live in a world where more nations and more people possess the ultimate tools of destruction. This fatalism is a deadly adversary. For if we believe that the spread of nuclear weapons is inevitable, then we are admitting to ourselves that the use of nuclear weapons is inevitable.

Just as we stood for freedom in the 20th century, we must stand together for the right of people everywhere to live free from fear in the 21st.
And as a nuclear power - as the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon - the United States has a moral responsibility to act. We cannot succeed in this endeavor alone, but we can lead it.

So today, I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. This goal will not be reached quickly - perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change.

First, the United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons.

To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy and urge others to do the same. Make no mistake: as long as these weapons exist, we will maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal to deter any adversary, and guarantee that defense to our allies - including the Czech Republic. But we will begin the work of reducing our arsenal.

To reduce our warheads and stockpiles, we will negotiate a new strategic arms reduction treaty with Russia this year. President Medvedev and I began this process in London, and will seek a new agreement by the end of this year that is legally binding, and sufficiently bold. This will set the stage for further cuts, and we will seek to include all nuclear weapons states in this endeavor.

To achieve a global ban on nuclear testing, my Administration will immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. After more than five decades of talks, it is time for the testing of nuclear weapons to finally be banned.

And to cut off the building blocks needed for a bomb, the United States will seek a new treaty that verifiably ends the production of fissile materials intended for use in state nuclear weapons. If we are serious about stopping the spread of these weapons, then we should put an end to the dedicated production of weapons grade materials that create them.

Second, together, we will strengthen the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as a basis for cooperation.

The basic bargain is sound: countries with nuclear weapons will move toward disarmament, countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them; and all countries can access peaceful nuclear energy. To strengthen the Treaty, we should embrace several principles. We need more resources and authority to strengthen international inspections. We need real and immediate consequences for countries caught breaking the rules or trying to leave the Treaty without cause.

And we should build a new framework for civil nuclear cooperation, including an international fuel bank, so that countries can access peaceful power without increasing the risks of proliferation. That must be the right of every nation that renounces nuclear weapons, especially developing countries embarking on peaceful programs. No approach will succeed if it is based on the denial of rights to nations that play by the rules. We must harness the power of nuclear energy on behalf of our efforts to combat climate change, and to advance opportunity for all people.

We go forward with no illusions. Some will break the rules, but that is why we need a structure in place that ensures that when any nation does, they will face consequences. This morning, we were reminded again why we need a new and more rigorous approach to address this threat. North Korea broke the rules once more by testing a rocket that could be used for a long range missile.

This provocation underscores the need for action - not just this afternoon at the UN Security Council, but in our determination to prevent the spread of these weapons. Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something. The world must stand together to prevent the spread of these weapons. Now is the time for a strong international response. North Korea must know that the path to security and respect will never come through threats and illegal weapons. And all nations must come together to build a stronger, global regime.

Iran has yet to build a nuclear weapon. And my Administration will seek engagement with Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect, and we will present a clear choice. We want Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations, politically and economically. We will support Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections. That is a path that the Islamic Republic can take. Or the government can choose increased isolation, international pressure, and a potential nuclear arms race in the region that will increase insecurity for all.

Let me be clear: Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile activity poses a real threat, not just to the United States, but to Iran’s neighbors and our allies. The Czech Republic and Poland have been courageous in agreeing to host a defense against these missiles. As long as the threat from Iran persists, we intend to go forward with a missile defense system that is cost-effective and proven. If the Iranian threat is eliminated, we will have a stronger basis for security, and the driving force for missile defense construction in Europe at this time will be removed.

Finally, we must ensure that terrorists never acquire a nuclear weapon.

This is the most immediate and extreme threat to global security. One terrorist with a nuclear weapon could unleash massive destruction. Al Qaeda has said that it seeks a bomb. And we know that there is unsecured nuclear material across the globe. To protect our people, we must act with a sense of purpose without delay.

Today, I am announcing a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years. We will set new standards, expand our cooperation with Russia, and pursue new partnerships to lock down these sensitive materials.

We must also build on our efforts to break up black markets, detect and intercept materials in transit, and use financial tools to disrupt this dangerous trade. Because this threat will be lasting, we should come together to turn efforts such as the Proliferation Security Initiative and the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism into durable international institutions. And we should start by having a Global Summit on Nuclear Security that the United States will host within the next year.

I know that there are some who will question whether we can act on such a broad agenda. There are those who doubt whether true international cooperation is possible, given the inevitable differences among nations.
And there are those who hear talk of a world without nuclear weapons and doubt whether it is worth setting a goal that seems impossible to achieve.

But make no mistake: we know where that road leads. When nations and peoples allow themselves to be defined by their differences, the gulf between them widens. When we fail to pursue peace, then it stays forever beyond our grasp. To denounce or shrug off a call for cooperation is an easy and cowardly thing. That is how wars begin. That is where human progress ends.

There is violence and injustice in our world that must be confronted. We must confront it not by splitting apart, but by standing together as free nations, as free people. I know that a call to arms can stir the souls of men and women more than a call to lay them down. But that is why the voices for peace and progress must be raised together.

Those are the voices that still echo through the streets of Prague.
Those are the ghosts of 1968. Those were the joyful sounds of the Velvet Revolution. Those were the Czechs who helped bring down a nuclear-armed empire without firing a shot.

Human destiny will be what we make of it. Here, in Prague, let us honor our past by reaching for a better future. Let us bridge our divisions, build upon our hopes, and accept our responsibility to leave this world more prosperous and more peaceful than we found it. Thank you.”


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

’We Are Moving Rapidly Towards an Abyss’
Report on Iran’s Nuclear Programme Sent to UN Security Council
Dennis Ross tells ’Post’ why Obama
A "Black Tide" in China, a catastrophe in France, both kept "off the radar".
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
Is the world in for a new cold age?
Gwangju Declaration of Nobel Peace Laureates
Will Citizens’ Action lay down its arms?
How Realistic Is a Nuclear-Armed Japan?
War With Russia Is On The Agenda

navigation motscles

Barack Obama
Letter to President Obama
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
Obama set to reject ‘nuclear posture’ on eve of Start deal with Russia
The "Peace President" Wants To Keep America’s Nukes
Nuclear Posture Review: Rhetoric vs. Reality
Democratic Nominee Barack Obama on Arms Control
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
USA
Shultz, Other Experts Back Nuclear Disarmament
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
Depleted Uranium Situation Worsens Requiring Immediate Action By President Bush, Prime Minister Blair, and Prime Minister Olmert
Ballistic Missile Defense: the new Cold War
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
India Abandons Global Nuclear Disarmament
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
Generals opposing Iraq war break with military tradition
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
US Statement on Disarmament/Nonproliferation

visites :  900560

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs