ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > External sources > Japan: Nuclear Madness
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

Japan: Nuclear Madness
by Satomi Oba


Published 13 November 2003

A report from Japan for the conference in Linz, Austria, November 2003.
For a brighter future - Strategies for a world without nuclear madness.

I. Introduction

Since President Bush seized power in a highly questionable way in November 2000, the global situation has become more serious and gloomy with the intensification of a pro-nuclear energy policy in the U.S., as well as of the continued research and development of mini-nukes, the continued conducting of underground subcritical tests, and the continued nuclearization of space.

Especially after 9.11. 2001, the US call for war on terrorism has deeply undermined the long-established international framework for peace and security of the worl. Even in this dismal situation, we have several pieces of good news regarding the nuclear energy issue:

1) The Monju verdict in Japan (January)
2) The shutdown of all the reactors of TEPCO for a period of time (April)
3) The victory of the Jabiluka campaign in Australia
4) BNFL’s decision to close THORP
5) The delay of starting up the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant

II. The Monju FBR and the Japanese MOX program

Japan now has 51 commercial reactors in operation. Besides these PWRs and WRs, there is a prototype fast breeder reactor named "Monju" in the Fukui Prefecture. The Monju reactor started its operations in August 1995, but it has been shut down since its sodium leak and fire that occurred in December of the same year. The FBR project was the major goal of Japan’s nuclear program, being a plan to produce more plutonium than is consumed as it burns in the reactor.

The residents in the vicinity of Monju as well as citizens around Japan are gravely concerned, and the local people have been struggling in court over this issue. On January 27, 2003, the Nagoya High Court ruled out the construction standard of the Monju reactor, accepting the plaintiff’s arguments re: the high risk of sodium fire and collapse of the core, though it rejected the argument on the seismic risks of the Monju design.

The victory was gained by means of the long, hard struggle of the residents, citizens, and experts working together. International support was also a helpful factor in achieving this positive outcom.

However, the government is angry with this verdict and has appealed it to the supreme court. Further, it intends to repair the plant before the supreme court hands down its judgment, planning to restart it as soon as possible.

Japan will eventually obtain more than 400 tons of plutonium according to a calculation based on the government’s long-term nuclear energy project which began in November 2000. Japan has already obtained more than 30 tons of plutonium separated from spent fuel. However, as yet, there is no definitive perspective about how the plutonium is to be used.

As the result of the Monju accident and its shut-down, the government now plans to burn plutonium in the conventional reactors in the form of plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel. But because of the series of scandals and defaults at the reactors around the country, the MOX program planned in three prefectures (Fukui, Fukushima, and Niigata) has faced strong local grassroots resistance, and is now at a complete stand still. The utilities are losing the public’s trust rapidly, because of their attempt to hide the falsification of fuel data supplied by the BNFL (1999), and their attempted cover-up of records regarding the cracks at the reactors of TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company) (2002), as well as of the criticality accident at the JCO company in
Tokaimura, Ibaraki Prefecture.

However, Kansai Electric (KEPCO) is planning to contract with French COGEMA to fabricate MOX fuel at its facility. (WISE/NIRS Nuclear Monitor 594) KEPCO emphasizes that they will "take every opportunity to promote activities...to gain back public trust in nuclear power".

III. Reprocessing

The Japanese utilities have sent more than 7000 tons of spent fuel for separating plutonium to Sellafield in Britain and La Hague in France.

The Japanese government and utilities argue that nuclear power is safe and clean, and is essential for preventing global warming by means of avoiding CO2 emissions. They also insist that electric demand will continue to grow, so we need more nuclear energy. We Japanese citizens have been overwhelmed by daily propaganda on TV, and in the newspapers. But very few people have been informed that our nuclear waste has been shipped to foreign countries and is contaminating the environment there with deadly poisons. There was almost no media coverage of this at the OSPAR meeting, as well as of the increase of leukaemia cases in the vicinity of the reprocessing plants. There has been no major report in the media about the BNFL’s decision to close THORP by 2010.

Reprocessing is a chemical process to extract plutonium and unburned uranium 235 from the spent fuel of nuclear reactors. The Japanese government, in response to criticism concerning nuclear proliferation, insists that the plutonium Japan is separating is reactor grade for "peaceful use", not weapons grade (more than 93 percent purity) .

But experts point out that reactor grade plutonium could be diverted into military use. According to the IAEA, 8kg of reactor grade plutonium is a "significant quantity", enough to make one nuclear bomb.

As we see no demand for commercial use of plutonium, a major and obvious question is why is Japan going to operate the huge reprocessing plant constructed in Rokkashomura, Aomori Prefecture?

The Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant had been scheduled to start testing using uranium in October 2003, and to start operation in July 2005. But in September, the government and operator announced the delay of the start-up of the plant until July 2006, while uranium testing is to be delayed three months, until January 2004. This is because of problems such as water leakage from the spent fuel pool, as well as nearly 300 failures of pipe welding.

If the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant does start operation, it will have the capacity to separate 7 tons of plutonium per year. It will continuously contaminate the environment in a wide area surrounding it. Once the uranium testing starts, the whole plant will be contaminated and it would be very difficult to return to past conditions.

Therefore, we demand the cancellation of the reprocessing program, not merely delaying the start-up of the operation.

IV. Japan’s involvement in nuclear colonialism

The first victims of the nuclear death chain have been indigenous peoples around the world. The nuclear cycle including uranium mining, processing of nuclear weapons, nuclear testing, operation of nuclear power plants, and waste dumping, all conducted primarily on the lands of indigenous peoples. The Japanese utilities are importing uranium for "peaceful use of nuclear power" from the indigenous peoples’ lands in North America, Africa, and Australia.

The victory of the Jabiluka Campaign in Australia was the first success that Japanese citizens were involved in. In late July 2003, Rio Tint finally decided to abandon its plan to explore new mining at the World Heritage site in the Kakadu National Park in the Northern Territory of Australia. KEPCO and several other companies had invested in the project. The victory at Kakadu was achieved by the cooperative action of the traditional landowners and Australian environmental movements supported by worldwide anti-nuclear opinion. The campaign included peaceful direct action. Quite a few Japanese citizens’ groups, especially groups in Kansai district (Kyoto, Osaka), joined the campaign when the World Heritage Committee was held in Kyoto in 1998.

The story of the aboriginal people in Kakadu is included in the book "Pacific Women Speak Out" (Edited by Zhol de Ishtar) together with other impressive testimonies of the islanders about their harsh experience under nuclear colonialism and their brave struggle for a nuclear free and independent Pacific. (English, German, and Japanese versions are available.)

V. Nuclear exports from Japan

Proliferation of nuclear power plants in Asia is a major concern. While the construction of new NPPs has almost stopped in America and Europe, a pro-nuclear energy policy based on the NPT is gaining strength in South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. Western nuclear countries are seeking a new market in South-Eastern Asian countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Philippines.

Since 1993, No Nukes Asia Forum, the Asian anti-nuclear network, has been vigorously working to prevent further proliferation of nuclear power plants in this region.

Taiwan (the Republic of China) has a history of nuclear weapons development during the 1980’s, and has not yet signed the NPT. There are six nuclear reactors in operation at three sites in Taiwan.

The Japanese companies Hitachi, Toshiba, and Mitsubishi, in cooperation with the US company GE, are constructing two reactors of the fourth NPP (ABWR) on the northeast coast of Taiwan despite opposition of the Taiwanese people. The site is in a national park and it originally belonged to the indigenous people there. The construction started without any information or any consultation with the indigenous people.

Instead, the people’s homes were torn down after the residents were
forcibly driven out of their village.

In June, 2003, a cargo ship loaded with a pressure vessel of a reactor
left the Port of Kure in Hiroshima despite the protests of Japanese
citizens groups. The construction of the reactors is continuing, but we
in Japan are protesting this in many ways, together with the Taiwanese
people.

VI. Earthquakes

From the seismic viewpoint, it is unbelievable that there are 50-plus
nuclear facilities scattered throughout Japan’s islands, as these
islands are riddled with countless active earthquake faults. (see the
map)

Geologically speaking, Japan enjoyed a comparatively calm period for
about 40 years after the end of WWII. This contributed to the unusually
rapid post-war economic development of Japan. However, the last decade
of the 20th century saw the beginning of another unstable period, with a
series of major earthquakes, including the one that hit Kobe City and
its vicinity in January 1995. The toll caused by that earthquake rose to
more than 6000. The damage to buildings, highways, railways including
the Shinkansen was extremely widespread, but fortunately there were no
nuclear power plants located there.

A geologist, Dr. Sunao Ogose, had warned that such a disaster could take
place in Kobe, pointing out the existence of an active fault, as well as
the vulnerability of modern structures.

This year, Japan experienced three big earthquakes in May, July, and
September. The first two (M=7.1 and M=8.0) were in Miyagi Prefecture in
Northern Japan. A small leak of coolant was reported at the Onagawa NPP.

The latest one hit Hokkaido on September 26, and it was huge,
registering 8.0. More than 500 peopled were injured, and great damage
was reported from the subsequent tsunami waves. A serious fire was
caused by the shock experienced at the petroleum refinery plant in
Tomakomai City, on the southern coast of Hokkaido. The fire restarted
at the same plant two days later and continued burning for 44 hours.
(WISE/NIRS Nuclear Monitor 594)

According to plate tectonics theory, Japan is floating on huge plates
that are moving very slowly. Japan’s islands are located on the borders
of four such plates: the Eurasian, North American, Philippine, and
Pacific. Seismic experts are now warning of possible huge earthquakes
caused by dynamic plate movement in the near future. Although the
government publicly claims that nuclear reactors and related facilities
are earthquake-proof, there remain serious questions re: seismic safety
in case of a huge earthquake. No one can guarantee their safety.

Citizens in the Shizuoka Prefecture filed a lawsuit to shut down the NPP
at Hamaoka, as the area is regarded as the most likely to be hit by a
major earthquake.

The Monju FBR, although it has been shut down since December 1995, is
standing on an active fault that the government is reluctant to
acknowledge. The Monju reactor is loaded with plutonium, and tons of
sodium are still circulating in its long, winding pipes. If the active
fault beneath the Monju moves, causing a strong shock, the resulting
catastrophe would be incredible. Dr. Ogose says that most dangerous
reactor from a seismic viewpoint would be the Monju.

Seismic problems are also extremely serious at the Rokkasho Reprocessing
plant and other nuclear facilities such as the uranium, enrichment
plant, the permanent storage of low level radioactive waste, and the
temporary storage of the high level waste. There is a major active
fault, 84 km long, running along the Pacific coast that includes the
Rokkashomura facilities.

There are also many other dangerous seismic situations. In 1997, there
were two big earthquakes that hit very close to the Sendai NPP in
Kyushu. The energy was even bigger than that of the Kobe earthquake in
1995. Three reactors of the Ikata NPP are built close to one of the two
largest active faults in Japan.

Again, there is no way to forecast an earthquake exactly, and the
government underestimates the seismic risks and dangers at the nuclear power plants regarding their ability to withstand seismic movement.

However, more experts and politicians than ever are now expressing
concern. For instance, Mitsuhei Murata, former ambassador to
Switzerland, is calling for the immediate shut down of the Hamaoka NPP,
as well as for the phase out of Japan’s pro-nuclear energy policy.
Also, several local councils have passed resolutions to stop the Hamaoka
NPP.

VII. Nuclear Proliferation

The second NPT review conference is to be held in New York in 2005. The
Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was created to prevent the
proliferation of nuclear weapons. But unfortunately, the NPT’s
extremely important Article 6th ---the obligation to disarm by the
nuclear weapons states --- has never been respected.

On the other hand, Article 4 of the NPT --- the right to "atoms for
peace" has been promoted vigorously by many party states and
non-signatory countries such as India and Pakistan. Most of the UN
member nations have signed the NPT except for India, Pakistan, and
Israel. DPRK has announced its withdrawal recently.

The IAEA’s role is a contradictory one — that of nuclear watchdog, and
at the same time, nuclear salesman. It is safer and easier for a state
to obtain nuclear materials or technologies by means of "atoms for
peace" than to gain them through smuggling or espionage. We have seen
this in the cases of Iran, Iraq, India and Pakistan.

Japan is openly promoting a massive use of plutonium under the guise of
civilian use. A fast breeder reactor can produce super-grade plutonium
through its operation. The Monju reactor has been shut down, but there
is another FBR called Joyo, an experimental reactor, which doesn’t
generate electricity. The tragic accident at JCO in Tokaimura in 1999
occurred during the process of fuel fabrication for the Joyo which is
located in the next town to Tokaimura.

Japan has the capability for creating nuclear warheads and also for
developing the H2A rocket equivalent for ICBMs. With the growing power
of the right wingers who are trying to trash Article 9 of the Japanese
constitution, the possibility of a Japanese nuclear arsenal is becoming
stronger.

Further, regardless of the legal obligation for a peaceful space
program, Japan launched its first military satellite from Tanegashima
in March 2003. It also sent troops to the Indian Ocean to support the
US-UK war on Iraq. And it is going to dispatch troops to Iraq. All
these actions violate the Japanese constitution.

It is ironic that the war on Iraq has resulted in greater public
attention being paid to civil nuclear systems that continue to produce
DU. Incidentally, "Depleted Uranium" is an incorrect name. It should
be called ?"dirty, dangerous, and destructive" uranium.

DU is waste generated by the nuclear chain involving both military and
civil nuclear production. At Rokkashomura, the enrichment plant has
already generated more than 7000 tons of deadly DU.

VIII. Our desire

Now, more than ever, the anti-nuclear energy movement must join with the
environmental movement, the human rights movement, the anti-war
movement, and anti-nuclear weapons movement.

It is natural and vital for us to coordinate these movements globally in
order to achieve a sustainable and secure world free from the nuclear
threat. Mr. Akiba, Mayor of Hiroshima, as President of "Mayors for
Peace", is calling for a strong campaign for nuclear abolition. In
Japan, there are many grassroots groups working ceaselessly to stop the
nuclear insanity. These noble efforts are also frequently seen in many
other parts of the world. It is obvious that if all these activities
work co-operatively, nuclear abolition is more likely to become a
reality. If we trust and support each other, our dream of a nuclear
free planet will come true.

I express my deepest gratitude to Sally Light who patiently edited my
humble report.

Satomi Oba (WISE Japan)
Director of Plutonium Action Hiroshima


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

India Abandons Global Nuclear Disarmament
World military spending grows to $1.7tn in 2015
The world can be powered by alternative energy, using today’s technology, in 20-40 years
A Salute to Colonel Valery Yarynich
Justice in Gaza - By Richard Goldstone
We are killing our own!
World Peace Forum Calls on the United States to Lead the World in Nuclear Disarmament
Obama set to reject ‘nuclear posture’ on eve of Start deal with Russia
Signs of Change in the First Committee
President Obama’s Speech in Hiroshima, 27 May 2016

visites :  885603

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs