ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > External sources > Obama set to reject ‘nuclear posture’ on eve of Start deal with Russia
ACDN, What is it ?

External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World




Background papers


French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

Obama set to reject ‘nuclear posture’ on eve of Start deal with Russia
By Mikael EVANS

Published 2 April 2010

President Obama will rewrite America’s policy on nuclear weapons next week, heralding further reductions in the US stockpile and giving a pledge not to develop new systems.

Pentagon Correspondent, The Times,
April 2, 2010

After a review of the nation’s nuclear weapons arsenal that has involved, among others, the Pentagon, the Department of Energy and the intelligence services, as well as the White House, Mr Obama is expected to reject the doctrine on nuclear weapons - the “nuclear posture” - adopted by George W. Bush, which included the possibility of the United States launching an attack on a non-nuclear state.

The Obama Administration has come under pressure from arms control analysts to redefine the circumstances in which the US might consider using nuclear weapons, and to state beyond doubt that the justification for keeping them is purely as a deterrent.

After the President’s speech in Prague last April, when he laid out his personal vision of a world without nuclear weapons, the US has been carrying out a review of its nuclear posture and the conclusions are due to be published in a declassified version early next week - before Mr Obama flies back to Prague to sign the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start) with President Medvedev of Russia on April 8.
Related Links

President Bush tried but failed to persuade Congress to finance a new programme to develop more advanced “bunker-busting” nuclear bombs, as well as to design new atomic warheads. Now Mr Obama is expected to rule out the development of new weapons systems - despite reservations from the military, which is mindful that Russia and China are modernising and expanding their nuclear forces respectively. He will also drop the notion, espoused by his predecessor, that nuclear warheads can be deployed in certain circumstances; for example, if another country resorts to attacking US forces with chemical or biological weapons.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association in Washington, said that if Mr Obama redefined nuclear arms as purely weapons of deterrence, it would “eliminate the number of potential targets the US military think they need to hit”. It would also reduce the number of nuclear weapons the US believes it needs, he said, which could bring the total well below the 1,550 strategic warheads agreed under the new Start treaty announced last week.

One of the key issues is whether Mr Obama should agree to make a new declaration that the US will never be the first to use nuclear weapons - no first-use, as it is called. Under Mr Bush the policy was deliberately ambiguous.

The Obama Administration could declare a “negative security assurance”, under which the US would pledge never to attack a non-nuclear state with nuclear weapons, provided that they were loyal upholders of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). “That would exclude North Korea and Iran,” Mr Kimball said.

In reviewing its nuclear arsenal, the US is considering withdrawing from Europe its last tactical nuclear weapons - 200 B61 gravity bombs - which are based in Belgium, Turkey, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands; all members of Nato. Under a longstanding agreement, the air forces of these countries would be expected to fly their own bombers carrying the American B61 bombs in the event of a conflict in which the US had approved the use of nuclear weapons.

A decision on this is not expected to be included in the revised nuclear posture, as it is a matter for discussion within Nato, which is developing an updated strategic concept. However, several countries say they want the nuclear gravity bombs to be withdrawn because there is no longer any justification for keeping them in Europe.

Mr Kimball said: “It’s not like the Red Army is going to be coming across Poland and Germany. Conflict between Russia and the US is unfathomable, but the nuclear weapons in Europe give the Russians the cynical excuse not to talk about their own strategy on tactical weapons.”

L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version

Share through social networks

Also in this section

Voting against nuclear war with Iran
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
We are killing our own!
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
A Farewell to Nuclear Arms
World Council of Churches: Seeking a nuclear weapon free world
Goldstone Report: Human Rights in Palestine
A move to erase all memory of the victims of nuclear testing?
Time to let Trident rust in peace?
Statement by the President of Russia on the unilateral withdrawal of the United States from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles

navigation motscles

Barack Obama
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
President Obama: "The United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons"
The "Peace President" Wants To Keep America’s Nukes
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
Letter to President Obama
Nuclear Posture Review: Rhetoric vs. Reality
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
Democratic Nominee Barack Obama on Arms Control
Nuclear disarmament
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
Open Letter to Prime Minister Gordon Brown
From ‘Ground Zero to Global Zero’ - a World Free of Nuclear Weapons
At the UN, France Must Move to the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons
Disarm to Develop
The Nuclear Issue: Disarm and Live
50 years of French nuclear weapons, 50 years too many!
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
Is the world in for a new cold age?
The second nuclear age
War With Russia Is On The Agenda
Good News from Russia: nuclear disarmament progressing... unintentionally!
The Paradox of Missile Defense
Ballistic Missile Defense: the new Cold War
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev speaks freely
START Treaty
Barack Obama undertakes to work for the abolition of nuclear weapons
US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits
Robert Gates: Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in the 21st Century
Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran

visites :  1094937

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs