ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > External sources > A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
By HARVEY WASSERMAN


Published 7 November 2008

As the world media filled with the victory of Barack Obama, a defeat for atomic power in his own back yard sent a Solartopian message to the new administration.

In the Chicago-area communities of Oak Park, Berwyn and Riverside, voters approved by well over two-to-one a referendum asking that “our elected officials in Illinois take steps to phase out nuclear power in the state, replacing it with renewable sources such as wind and solar.”

The three communities currently rely on atomic power for some 75% of their electricity, which is supplied through Commonwealth Edison, a subsidiary of Exelon, America’s largest nuke owner. With 11 operating reactors, Illinois has more reactors than any other state.

But 31,586 (68.3%) voters approved the referendum, versus 14,676 (31.7%) opposed.

Atomic energy will be one of the most critical issues the new administration will face. Obama was criticized by eco-advocates for taking campaign donations from Exelon. Both he and Vice President-elect Joe Biden expressed campaign support for atomic power.

But their stance was moderated by Obama’s insistence that atomic power be “safe,” and by his ads he ran in Nevada opposing the Yucca Mountain radioactive waste dump. Some 80% of Nevada citizens oppose that project, whose projected cost now runs about $100 billion.

By contrast, John McCain vehemently advocated the quick construction of some 45 new reactors. He derided the moderation of Obama’s reactor advocacy, pointing with pride to his own naval service on nuke-powered vessels.

But the issue of how to finance such a “nuclear renaissance” now overshadows all the rhetoric, and will define the technology’s future.

A strong lobby with a slick, expensive pubic relations campaign is now pushing new nukes here. New ratepayer-based reactor financing is now being shoved through state public utilities commissions in Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas and possibly elsewhere, with tens of billions in potential liability.

But Wall Street has given thumbs down to a technology that can’t compete with Solartopian sources like wind, solar, tidal, geothermal and other green energies.

The future of new reactor construction thus depends on massive federal and state subsidies. In the fall of 2007, the industry inserted into a Congressional energy bill a package of loan guarantees meant to provide $50 billion in taxpayer-backed funds to build new reactors.

Reactor projects fail about 50% of the time, and such a package could have stuck taxpayers with a massive liability. A national grassroots campaign led in part by NukeFree.org and musicians Bonnie Raitt, Jackson Browne and Graham Nash helped defeat the package. Not a single major national environmental organization supported the guarantees.

This fall an even larger federal loan plan, offering virtually unlimited funds, was on its way to the US Senate. Pushed by McCain, it could have provided a half-trillion dollars in new taxpayer guarantees to build just the 45 reactors McCain proposed.

But when Wall Street collapsed, the federal bank bailout made the idea of taking on still more huge financial liabilities untenable.

As Barack Obama takes office in January, green power advocates will again argue that along with questions of terror and error, radioactive waste and ecological harm, nuke power is far too expensive to compete with Solartopian green power.

The clock is ticking very fast on the idea of new nukes. With projected construction times of a decade or more, new reactors cannot begin to deliver energy for many years after the installation of competing green sources, whose comparative costs continue to drop.

So this small but strong Chicago-area vote for a Solartopian future sends a very clear message. A powerful new nuke lobby will be pushing hard from Day One of the new administration.

But in today’s financial and political climate, atomic energy cannot compete. A green-powered planet is the only one that will sell on both Main Street and Wall Street.


Harvey Wasserman, a co-founder of Musicians United for Safe Energy, is editing the nukefree.org web site. He is the author of SOLARTOPIA! Our Green-Powered Earth , A.D. 2030, is at www.solartopia.org He can be reached at: Windhw@aol.com


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

The Nuclear Zero Lawsuits: Taking Nuclear Weapons to Court
Statement by the President of Russia on the unilateral withdrawal of the United States from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles
The Challenge of Disarmament: Still Nonviolence or Nonexistence
Pre-emptive nuclear strike a key option, Nato told
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
24 September: Organisations worldwide urge UN Security council to go to zero on nuclear weapons
Obama’s Big Budget
’A Coup Has Occurred’
Leading Italian politicians join in call for nuclear abolition
Hiroshima Peace Declaration

navigation motscles

Barack Obama
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Obama set to reject ‘nuclear posture’ on eve of Start deal with Russia
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
President Obama: "The United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons"
Democratic Nominee Barack Obama on Arms Control
Nuclear Posture Review: Rhetoric vs. Reality
The "Peace President" Wants To Keep America’s Nukes
Letter to President Obama
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
No to civil and military nuclearism!
Will France be caught with its plants down?
THE CRISIS IS NOT RESOLVING ITSELF
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
France’s new president planning to sell nuclear power plants to Algeria
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
Nuclear is not the Answer

visites :  900942

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs