ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > Communiqués > No to civil and military nuclearism!
ACDN, What is it ?

News
Communiqués
External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Actions
2nd RID-NBC
3rd RID-NBC
Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World

Petitions

Correspondance
International

Medias

Background papers

EUROPE

French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

No to the EPR!
No to civil and military nuclearism!
A solution for the Iran crisis.


Published 15 April 2006

There are many reasons for opposing the building of the EPR (European Pressurised Reactor), as was seen on April 15 at the great demonstration in Cherbourg. But there is one which is highlighted by international events and which deserves to be emphasized: the EPR would contribute to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the risks of nuclear war.

France has no need of the EPR; it is conceived above all for export. Plans of it have already been sold to Finland. The first prototype and the one planned for Flamanville (Normandy) - if its construction were to go ahead - will be shop-windows intended to capture foreign buyers from around the world and particularly the developing nations. AREVA and EDF have already been approaching China and India, with the support of the French foreign office. President Chirac’s recent trip to India had two major commercial objectives: to sell arms, such as submarines and warplanes, and to sell nuclear plants, like the future EPR.

On 30 March 2006, Iran proposed the setting-up of an international consortium including France, Germany and Russia, to help the Iranians to realise their non-military nuclear ambitions. There is no doubt that if this consortium were set up France and Germany, being associated with the EPR through AREVA and SIEMENS, would use it as a sales argument.

But consider the current crisis surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme. What does it confirm? That nuclear technologies are dual, that it is impossible to build a firewall between their civilian use for energy production and their military use for making weapons. The same knowledge and the same technicians produce both, as is verified also in France. The same process of enriching uranium ore in U235 produces the fuel for power plants and the explosive for bombs. And the plutonium extracted from the plants can also be used as explosive material. The EPR will be no exception to this rule. The desire to export it therefore amounts to authorising one hand to do what the other hand is banned from doing. In a sense, it is tempting the devil: every State with an EPR will be able (if it so decides one day) to use it as Trojan Horse for its Bomb. The international community is becoming aware of this in the case of Iran, not before time, after letting Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea obtain atomic weapons under the cover of non-military programmes.

That is why ACDN suggested to the Iranian government, by letter and during an audience at its Paris embassy on March 30, that it renounce its civilian nuclear programme and assume a leading role among nations promoting the abandonment of nuclear plants, energy economies, the development of sustainable energies, and nuclear disarmament. Although this suggestion was not adopted, it remains an option today, at the time when the “Iran dossier” threatens to result in “international sanctions”, and even in military action envisaged by the USA, action which could even include the use of nuclear weapons. That would be a crowning irony, given the ostensible desire to prevent... the use of nuclear weapons.

This question will be raised again during the 2nd RID-NBC (Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) which takes place on 6-8 May in Saintes (Western France). On 6 May 2006 at 5pm, in the Auditorium Saintonge, there is a public debate on the subject: « Civilian and Military Nuclear Technology: the Iran Dossier”. One of the speakers will be Mr Moujani, who heads the diplomatic mission in France of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

We call on the citizens and elected representatives of France and Europe to be engaged in this dialogue and to set an example of nuclear renunciation by demanding the immediate suspension of the EPR programme.

ACDN, 15 April 2006


L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version


Share through social networks

Also in this section

LONG LIVE THE NUCLEAR BOMB, THE WEAPON OF DICTATORS!
August 9, 1945: Why Nagasaki?
NUCLEAR APOCALYPSE: FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT
26 September: The UN’s World Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons
France breaks its word and provokes the international community.
Nuclear democracy
Hunger strike for Michel Bernard, André Larivière et Dominique Masset
THE ECOLOGISTS MAKE THEIR COMMITMENTS
The 8th NPT Review Conference has unanimously adopted a final declaration
Great Success for Anti-Globalisation Gathering in the Larzac

navigation motscles

Civilian and millitary nuclearism
Why the Nuclear Energy Path is Suicidal
The team of "Energy Challenge" made landfall at Sainte Anne de la Martinique
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
Mohamed ElBaradei - Nobel Lecture
France is going to change her method of enriching uranium
DECLARATION of the Mediterranean No Nuclear Neighbourhood - MN3
Nobel Peace Prize award to Mohammed El-Baradei and the IAEA
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
In full: Brown’s nuclear speech
The Nuclear Issue: Disarm and Live
EPR
FRANCE
The Farce of France’s Nuclear Strike Force
THE “KING” IS MAD. REMOVE HIM!
Does François Bayrou really want nuclear disarmament ?
For an ecologist candidacy in the Primary of the Left
Towards a UN Investigation into Depleted Uranium in Gaza
In Washington, Sarkozy is defending France’s nuclear deterrence
President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
No to War, No to NATO!
Nicolas Sarkozy considering the future role of nuclear weapons in our system of defense
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
IRAN
For a Middle East without Weapons of Mass Destruction
WWIII or Bust: Implications of a US Attack on Iran
StratCom already planning pre-emptive strike on Iran
IRAN : International Rally in Saintes - last chance for peace and nuclear disarmament?
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
IRAN : No proliferation! No war!
WHO IS LYING? AND FEEDING DISINFORMATION? WHO IS OPPRESSING WHOM?
Countdown to War on Iran
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
Nuclear power plants
THE CRISIS IS NOT RESOLVING ITSELF
US-India Nuclear Deal
Nuclear is not the Answer
IRANIAN PLEA
On Indo-US Nuke Deal
Tehran triangle: Russia, U.S. and nuclear power
Implications of the US-India nuclear deal and the task for the peace movement
A Blow to Nuclear Power in Chicago
Nuclear Power and the Probability of Severe Accidents
The four-handed game of French nuclear policy
War
Israelis consider attack on Iran
Our Troops Must Leave Iraq
War With Russia Is On The Agenda
PARLIAMENTARIANS AND CIVIL SOCIETY APPEAL ON IRAN AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
Robert Gates: Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in the 21st Century
US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits
The death-cult
Calling for a cease-fire
Voting against nuclear war with Iran

visites :  889977

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs