ACDN - Action of Citizens for Nuclear Disarmament
logo ACDN banniere ACDNVisiter ACDN
Accueil-Home ACDN Contact ACDN Consulter le plan du site - SiteMap Other Version
vous etes ici Homepage > News > News Articles > President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
ACDN, What is it ?

External sources
Letters from ACDN
News Articles

Campaign "The Very Last Atom!"
Gathering for a Livable World




Background papers


French Elections
News of the Presidential Campaign

Off to war
President Sarkozy is ready to support the "bombing of Iran"...
...if Iran does what France has done!

Published 3 September 2007

On Monday 27 August 2007, speaking at the conference of France’s ambassadors all meeting in Paris, President Nicolas Sarkozy declared: “An Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable to me, and I am weighing my words”. The crisis surrounding Iran’s nuclear programme is "doubtless the most serious one in international affairs today”, he added, “France will spare no effort to convince Iran that it has much to gain from negotiating seriously with the Europeans, the Chinese and Russians, and of course the Americans”. France has a “total commitment to the current method which combines increasing sanctions with an opening-up if Iran chooses to respect its obligations... This method is the only one that can enable us to escape from a catastrophic alternative: the Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran.”

President Sarkozy seems unaware that on 13 July Iran made a major gesture, welcomed as such (according to the BBC) by the UN: it accepted the resumption of IAEA inspections, beginning with the inspection of one of its most sensitive nuclear facilities, the Arak heavy water reactor. Mohammed El-Baradei, the IAEA’s director, declared then that “deals such as this will serve as a way to defuse the ongoing diplomatic crisis over Iran". That agreement has been honoured within the specified time: a site-inspection indeed took place on July 30, lasting five hours.

Yet the French press, so quick to announce the slightest Iranian move that might appear provocative, barely said a word about this. Are France’s ambassadors and Foreign Minister also ignorant? Could they have forgotten to tell the President? Could the intelligence services fail also? Did President Bush not speak of it to President Sarkozy when they picnicked together on August 11? Could Bush be as “badly informed” about Iran as he claims he was about Iraq?

For good information, Nicolas Sarkozy, George W. Bush, their diplomatic services and intelligence agencies, not to mention the French and US press, should listen to the BBC... or should regularly visit ACDN’s website That would have enabled them, for example, to read on August 2: UN hails Iran nuclear agreement on the Arak Heavy Water facility and its French translation: “Iran’s Nuclear Programme: a Solution in Sight... and nobody mentions it!”.

But perhaps those silences are deliberate? Perhaps an Iran that is resistant to western injunctions, a “bombable Iran”, suits them better? On that count France also is “bombable”: under Nicolas Sarkozy as under previous presidents, she has refused to honour article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and has therefore “chosen to NOT respect her obligations” under the NPT.

President Sarkozy, failing to mention this monumental contradiction any more than that agreement of 13 July between Iran and the IAEA (which he should have welcomed since he claims to favour diplomatic solutions), confronts us with an alternative: “the Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran.” But if “an Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable” to him, and if Iran, irrespective of what it says or does, is considered guilty of what it is suspected, then, inexorably, Nicolas Sarkozy will lend France’s support to a new military adventure in the Middle East, supposing Washington (or Tel Aviv) happens to decide to start one. On this point, Sarkozy’s break with Jacques Chirac’s policies is complete. It is less complete when it comes to nuclear exports: in 1975 Jacques Chirac sold Saddam Hussein the “Osirak” reactor, which invited the Israeli bombing of June 1981 and then the “Gulf War” of 1991, and now Nicolas Sarkozy promises to provide a nice dictator named Gaddafi (and besides him all the muslim world except Iran) with the nuclear technology that is deemed to be dangerous only in the hands of the Iranian mullahs.

Under these circumstances, can one seriously say that President Sarkozy wishes to avoid catastrophe? No, he is preparing for catastrophe, in two ways, and preparing us for it.

But what does the parliamentary opposition think - if it still exists? What will the French people think when they discover they have been misinformed and manipulated, that France’s hypocrisy, which authorizes for her what it forbids others to have, is the surest agent of nuclear proliferation and of serial wars, wars that are called “pre-emptive” which means that they are expected to prevent the effects of the evil that the West has itself provoked?

In truth, the only two methods “that can enable us to escape from a catastrophic alternative”, are for France and the other nuclear-weapon states to finally implement the solemn commitment they made, when they signed the NPT, to eliminate their own arsenals; and for France to cease dispersing in all directions the “non-military” means for obtaining such weapons.

The only solution to save the planet is denuclearisation - the decision to exit without further delay from both military and civilian nuclear technology.

ACDN France (Action des Citoyens pour le Désarmement Nucléaire), 30 August 2007

L'argent est le nerf de la paix ! ACDN vous remercie de lui faire un DON

Other versions
print Printable version
pdfPDF Version

Share through social networks

Also in this section

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons - the definitive proof
Iran reaffirms that it has no intention of obtaining nuclear weapons.
David against Goliath : nine nuclear states, sued for the first time, risk being ordered to destroy their arsenals
2011 World Conference against A & H Bombs: Final Declaration of the International Meeting
Is Brazil resuming its progress towards the Bomb?
A French presidential candidate goes on hunger strike
Japan after earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima: testimonies
Why hold a referendum, and why this particular referendum?
You don’t cure the plague by spreading cholera
Nuclear Disarmement: President Hollande’s Dereliction of Duty

navigation motscles

Towards a UN Investigation into Depleted Uranium in Gaza
War against Iran
Will Citizens’ Action lay down its arms?
No to civil and military nuclearism!
Question to the Mayor of Paris, Bertrand Delanoë: What should France do?
Barack Obama undertakes to work for the abolition of nuclear weapons
IRAN : International Rally in Saintes - last chance for peace and nuclear disarmament?
The Nuclear Issue: Disarm and Live
At the UN, France Must Move to the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons
Will France be caught with its plants down?
Countdown to War on Iran
Time For Clear Public Understanding of Iranian Threat
Leading Americans Ask U.S. Military to Refuse Orders to Attack Iran
"Israel will not lower its guard." Nor will Bush and Sarkozy.
The solution exists, it just has to be seized!
Negotiating with Iran is maddening, but bombing would be a catastrophe
Iran and the Bomb
Appeal to All Europeans To Prevent War Against Iran
Russian Military Sources Warn Attack on Iran 6 April
Nicolas Sarkozy
50 years of French nuclear weapons, 50 years too many!
In Washington, Sarkozy is defending France’s nuclear deterrence
Worldwide nuclear disarmament is the only response to anarchic proliferation
Nicolas Sarkozy considering the future role of nuclear weapons in our system of defense
The Farce of France’s Nuclear Strike Force
100 personalities from around the world launch the "Global Zero" Campaign
Nuclear disarmament
Good News from Russia: nuclear disarmament progressing... unintentionally!
The Hiroshima Flame: impressive progress through France
From ‘Ground Zero to Global Zero’ - a World Free of Nuclear Weapons
Open Letter to the French socialist candidates and leaders
3rd Rally for International Disarmament, Nuclear, Biological and Chemical
Open Letter on NATO Missile Defense Plans and Increased Risk of Nuclear War
2nd Rally for International Disarmament - Nuclear, Biological and Chemical
Cardinal Lustiger, the Church in France, and the Atom Bomb
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament
Depleted Uranium Situation Worsens Requiring Immediate Action By President Bush, Prime Minister Blair, and Prime Minister Olmert
Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize
US Statement on Disarmament/Nonproliferation
Nuclear Posture Review: Rhetoric vs. Reality
Is the world in for a new cold age?
Voting against nuclear war with Iran
The military’s problem with the President’s Iran policy.
Letter to President George W. Bush, 28 February 2006
US Scraps Bunker Buster
April 6, 2007 : How the worst was perhaps averted
UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells. Europe contaminated?
US Economy: Rudderless and Reeling From Direct Hits
No to War, No to NATO!
The death-cult
The fallout from an attack on Iran would be devastating
Generals opposing Iraq war break with military tradition
Gaza War Crimes: Israeli Government Contradicts its Own "Self-Defense" Argument
Robert Gates: Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in the 21st Century
Bush doesn’t want detente. He wants to attack Iran

visites :  1230620

Home | Contact | Site Map | Admin |

Site powered by SPIP
design et fonction Easter-Eggs